Homelab, Linux, JS & ABAP (~˘▾˘)~
 

Tag: SAP

Functionmodule, Workflow

[ABAP] Read ACTION_COMMENTS from Workitem

 , , , , ,

The Attribute ACTION_COMMENTS is of type SWC_VALUE, which is a char with length 255.

If the entered text has less than < 255 characters, there is just one element named ‘ACTION_COMMENTS’ in the workitem container.

If the user entered a text with more than 255 characters, the text is split and there are more elements named with ‘ACTION_COMMENTS_1’, ‘ACTION_COMMENTS_2’ etc. (Note 3017539)

There is the function module SAP_WAPI_READ_CONTAINER to read Workitems. As input for the function module, you need the workitemId from the decision step. You will then find the ACTION_COMMENTS in the simple_container table.

    DATA: return_code              TYPE sy-subrc,
          simple_container         TYPE TABLE OF swr_cont,
          message_lines            TYPE TABLE OF swr_messag,
          message_struct           TYPE TABLE OF swr_mstruc,
          subcontainer_bor_objects TYPE TABLE OF swr_cont,
          subcontainer_all_objects TYPE TABLE OF swr_cont,
          object_content           TYPE TABLE OF solisti1.

    " Read the work item container from the work item ID
    CALL FUNCTION 'SAP_WAPI_READ_CONTAINER'
      EXPORTING
        workitem_id              = wiid
      IMPORTING
        return_code              = return_code
      TABLES
        simple_container         = simple_container
        message_lines            = message_lines
        message_struct           = message_struct
        subcontainer_bor_objects = subcontainer_bor_objects
        subcontainer_all_objects = subcontainer_all_objects.


    TRY.
        DATA(text) = simple_container[ element = 'ACTION_COMMENTS' ]-value.
      CATCH cx_sy_itab_line_not_found.
      " Check for ACTION_COMMENTS_1 etc.
      " or follow the approach below
    ENDTRY.

The comment is also added as attachment to the workitem. Just check the table subcontainer_all_objects, which is also returned by the previous function module, for attribute _ATTACH_COMMENT_OBJECTS (or _ATTACH_OBJECT or DECISION_NOTE). With function module SO_DOCUMENT_READ_API1 you can then get the actual comment.

    " Read the _ATTACH_COMMENT_OBJECTS element
    " There can be more than one comment, just take the last one
    LOOP AT subcontainer_all_objects INTO DATA(comment_object) WHERE element = '_ATTACH_COMMENT_OBJECTS'.
    ENDLOOP.

    CHECK comment_object-value IS NOT INITIAL.

    " Read the SOFM Document
    CALL FUNCTION 'SO_DOCUMENT_READ_API1'
      EXPORTING
        document_id    = CONV so_entryid( comment_object-value )
      TABLES
        object_content = object_content
      EXCEPTIONS
        OTHERS         = 1.

    LOOP AT object_content INTO DATA(lv_soli).
      CONCATENATE text lv_soli-line INTO text.
    ENDLOOP.

As you get a table as a result, it’s properly easier to read long comments this way.

CAP

[CAP] BAS – port 4004 is already in use by another server process

 , , , , ,

If the default port 4004 is already open and you want to see what is bound to it, select View -> Find Command -> Ports Preview

Solution to kill another “watch.js” process using/blocking the port: https://answers.sap.com/questions/13016130/sap-business-application-studio-stop-running-serve.html
To archive the same in a single command use:

lwctl -c basic-tools kill -9 $(lwctl -c basic-tools ps aux | grep watch.js | awk '{print $2}')

As alternative, change the default port by adding a new port in package.json to the start script, for example: “start”: “cds run –port 4003” and use npm run start instead of cds watch.

Update 20.02.2023: Just had the problem again due to a VPN disconnect. But this time I had an application running using cds run. Therefore, I had to change the command from watch.js to cds.js:

lwctl -c basic-tools kill -9 $(lwctl -c basic-tools ps aux | grep cds.js | awk '{print $2}')

Update 10.05.2023: A better approach seems to be killing the node process. This should work in both situation.

lwctl -c basic-tools kill -9 $(lwctl -c basic-tools ps aux | grep node | awk '{print $2}')

Update 29.02.2024: With the BAS migration to Code – OSS the previous commands were not working anymore, but this new command seems to work:

kill -9 $(ps aux | grep cds.js | awk '{print $2}')
# or
kill -9 $(ps aux | grep cds-dk | awk '{print $2}')
CAP

[CAP] Query teamMembersSize from SuccessFactors

 , , , , , , 
const sfsfSrv = await cds.connect.to('sfsf')

// Option 1: Query Notation
const response = await sfsfSrv.run(SELECT`teamMembersSize`.from`User`.where`userId = ${req.user.id}`)
console.log("option 1: " + response[0].teamMembersSize)

// Option 2: HTTP method-style
const response2 =  await sfsfSrv.get(`/User('${req.user.id}')/teamMembersSize/$value`)
console.log("option 2: " + response2)
CAP

[CAP] Easy way to test if your approuter is working

 , , , ,

An easy way to test your approuter is using the user-api-service. For that add the following route to your xs-app.json

    {
        "source": "^/user-api(.*)",
        "target": "$1",
        "service": "sap-approuter-userapi"
    }

And after deployment, open the application router URL and add /user-api/currentUser to it. You should see your Email and other User details. This is testing that the application router is actually getting the security token from the UAA instance.

CAP

[CAP] SAPUI5 Filter using FilterOperator.Contains with oData V2

 , , , , , , , , ,

In my SAPUI5 Freesstyle frontend I created a search field above a list. In the searchfield handler I’m creating a filter with the provided query.

const sQuery = oEvent.getParameter("query");
new Filter("firstName", FilterOperator.Contains, sQuery);

Afterwards I’m binding the filter to my list to trigger the binding refresh. But when debugging the backend handler I noticed the following…

In my CAP on Read handler, the filter gets converted into a V4 compatible filter expression:

oData V4: $filter=contains(firstName,'Max')

As I’m forwarding the request to an external V2 oData API (SuccessFactors) this would not work, as for V2 the following filter syntax is needed:

oData V2: $filter=substringof('Max',firstName) eq true

As I could not find any solution to this problem, I manually passed my filter as custom property to my CAP Service and did a manual select.

Adding the custom property in the frontend in my searchfield handler:

onSearch: function (oEvent) {
			if (oEvent.getParameters().refreshButtonPressed) {
				this.onRefresh();
				return;
			}

			let oBindingInfo = this._oList.getBindingInfo("items");
			if (!oBindingInfo.parameters) oBindingInfo.parameters = {};
			if (!oBindingInfo.parameters.custom) oBindingInfo.parameters.custom = {};

			if (oEvent.getParameter("query")) {
				oBindingInfo.parameters.custom.filter = "%" + oEvent.getParameter("query") + "%";
			} else {
				oBindingInfo.parameters.custom.filter = undefined
			}
			this._oList.bindItems(oBindingInfo);
}

My CAP handler with the filter handling:

const { Object } = srv.entities
const SF_Srv = await cds.connect.to('SF')

srv.on('READ', Object, async req => {

            if (!req._queryOptions.filter) {
                // share request context with the external service 
                return SF_Srv.tx(req).run(req.query);
            } else {
                //if filter provided, build manually a select statement using a where condition
                let input = req._queryOptions.filter;
                const tx = SF_Srv.transaction(req);
                return await tx.run(
                    SELECT
                        .from(Object)
                        .where`firstName like ${input} or lastName like ${input}`)
            }
    })

As alternative you could also add the where condition directly to the query object:

const { Object } = srv.entities
const SF_Srv = await cds.connect.to('SF')

srv.on('READ', Object, async req => {

            if (req._query.filter) {
                //if filter provided, build manually a select statement using a where condition
                let { query } = req
                let input = req._queryOptions.filter

                if (!query.SELECT.where) query.SELECT["where"] = []

                query.SELECT.where.push(
                    { ref: ['firstName'] }, 'like', { val: input }, "or",
                    { ref: ['lastName'] }, 'like', { val: input }, "or",
                    { ref: ['object'] }, 'like', { val: input })
            }

            // share request context with the external service 
            return SF_Srv.tx(req).run(req.query)
    })